A couple of days ago, I had the opportunity to give my opinion, at the highest level, on the issue of modernizing the compensation and the distribution of benefit in enterprises. These ideas do not represent a projection of what could be the future of compensation within Pentalog. They are designed to fight against the gloom and try to fill in some of the great inequalities between employers and employees. In 1930, Henry Ford believed that the difference between the top and the bottom of the compensation scale in an enterprise should not exceed a ratio of 20. Later, the consensus was permanently established at a value of 40. But in 2008, the rate commonly exceeded 100, or even 400 and in some rare cases even 1000.
I believe, as many people do, that this is not acceptable, even if I am already aware that personally I’m on the right side of this scale.
So what can we do, knowing it is essential for those who have requested my opinion that the interests of corporations and their shareholders be protected to the maximum? Indeed, altering the labor cost in times of crisis can be disastrous for the economy of a nation, which could lead to enterprises and funds leave its territory.
First, it is obvious to me that the dilemma I have just created contains a solution, which has always been the basis of my thinking and I always tried to apply it within Pentalog: employees should have access to corporate shareholding. Any contradiction between the benefit necessary to the investor and the income of the employee is solved when the employee himself becomes a shareholder and entrepreneur, along with his colleagues. For many reasons, it is not easy, because sometimes employees do not understand their interest and are more interested in immediate revenues.
This contradiction is at the heart of the French authorities thinking. How to bring more revenue knowing that we are experiencing a serious crisis and that many French might even lose their jobs.
For my part, I identify two potential, serious tracks that I will propose, as a short reflection (I am not a parliamentarian, each one with his job :
Here they are in order of importance and according to my personal philosophy:
1. Developing employee ownership by all the possible means (stock options, free shares, increase of capital, all means are good). For this, we need to exempt to the maximum these operations in order to increase their leverage effect and ensure that the exercise of options or free shares, by tax effect, won’t reduce the purchasing power. Anyway it is ultimately the only sustainable way to develop the employee capital through his work. Why not take advantage of the crisis to allow employees to acquire stock holding within the company? You may thing I’ve gone crazy, admit it! Yet, I hear daily about distribution of cash and assistance to companies. So why not help the employees to participate in the capital increase of their business when this is needed, through regional funds. I do not want to be naively optimistic about this because I believe the granting of options, and moreover of free shares, should concern people who respect the company, its values and its project. But why not define the criteria, under a collective agreement, incorporating loyalty, performance, collective involvement…
2. Sharing the value added, dear to our president of the Republic. I am not hostile and I hereby propose a method for potential development. Why not implement in enterprises, indicators batteries for the calculation of VA, which would then create a quarterly variable (since this is now the analysis period of all companies) to be paid with the payroll of the following month at the end of the quarter? Pentalog uses these types of systems for a large majority of the employees. They are implemented for most of them, with respect to individual and qualitative performance to date. Others are “awarded” based on a collective performance (Branch managers for example). The principle remains that these tools provide more above the agreed wage, which is a result of market and sector agreements in countries where it exists. Therefore, in this case, a variable is a true “plus” to compensation. It represents, depending on people, around 10% of gross wages within Pentalog (i.e. more than a 13th month and they are paid every 3 months.) Will we think about the variable on the overall VA of the company, or on its partial results, in addition to or as a replacement for current bonuses, predominantly productivity-oriented? In any case, I will put this idea on the table of ideas for the future. In France such a device could work together with the participation agreements, when they exist in the company. The principle is to define a compensation variable to payment almost immediately.
Finally, what prevents us from combining the two ideas, and allowing the employee to convert compensation elements (variable, time savings account …) into shares within the company? After all, there are moments in the life of a company where cash is scarce and everyone’s motivation is valuable. This may truly be an interesting weapon.
At Pentalog France we have more than 40% employee shareholders. Some people have between 5 and 10% of the capital, equivalent in value to several hundred thousand euros (about EUR 100 000 for 1%). However, there are not too many in Romania-Moldova, although we have made progress recently. But the culture “cash is king” has prevailed until now.
I’m still a supporter of corporate shareholding. I also think back to the time when I met investment funds, as prestigious as deplorable in imagination, and which recommended me to “stop it”.
Well ladies and gentlemen, please know that I intend to seriously re-open in 2009, if our plans come true as we planed a few months ago. Pentalog has made cash reserves before entering the typhoon and so far, we see no reason to change them.